Political History Lesson:Exaggerated Margins of Support for Black Candidates in a Biracial Election

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
“A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have.” - Thomas Jefferson

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Visit our Sponsors: Author Directory | Valid Pagerank Checker, Press Release Distribution | Family Friendly Sites | Free Directory | Directory Submission | Business Directory | Non Profit Press Release | SEO Press Releases | Free Directory | Business Directory | Free Business Listings | Tech Jobs | Technology Jobs | IT Jobs | Promote your site for free | Tech News
Copyright 2007. Audacity Of Hypocrisy. All rights reserved

The only problem with this history is that in only one case did the candidate predicted to win actually lose. Yes, the margins were closer in most cases, but the outcome was the same.
Also, this chart does not indicate what the respective margins of error were, so we have no idea if the differences between the polls and the actual votes mean anything.
The Obama campaign cares nothing for the truth (or else Obama would be telling his audiences, “Don’t vote for me. I don’t know why I got into this race; I’m really not fit to be President”). If we’re going to see this election won on principle, let’s us stick to the truth.
(Yes, I know that seems pretty naive of me, but time will tell whether I’m right. Go for the long-term goal, not a mere near-term apparent victory.)